tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20631069.post2398238056811791777..comments2024-03-28T03:20:17.335-04:00Comments on Ibnat al-Hidayah: Daughter of Guidance: More News on Local ArrestsAmyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15177578450022894894noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20631069.post-66093490342857401482009-08-05T14:26:03.459-04:002009-08-05T14:26:03.459-04:00Ah.
To "detain and question" rather th...Ah. <br /><br />To "detain and question" rather than to "arrest." That's an interesting opinion though (about the mental distress to induce them to speak freely), thanks for sharing.Amyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15177578450022894894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20631069.post-11717735409483299672009-08-05T13:36:15.569-04:002009-08-05T13:36:15.569-04:00Actually, the point was not to arrest the women. ...Actually, the point was not to arrest the women. They were only detained and questioned. (and then released) It is not uncommon to use a ruse to move suspects (or 'persons of interest') to a more neutral location. However, this 'ruse' was used to put the women in a state of severe distress. Had it been simply to remove them from the location of the house, the ruse would have been complete once they were in the police car and driven away from the house. Instead, the 'tactic' was used to create an emotional state more likely to lead to them speaking in a state of distress and therefore more likely to 'let slip' useful information. <br />(my humble opinion)Ali Zelmathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01059646755023340511noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20631069.post-40027522207917450302009-08-02T13:24:16.417-04:002009-08-02T13:24:16.417-04:00Anonymous--the trick was not to arrest the men who...Anonymous--the trick was not to arrest the men who were accused, but rather to arrest the women--Boyd's wife, daughter, and daughter-in-law. <br /><br />They weren't indicted, accused of being terrorists, etc. They're women. But they were arrested and interrogated, after the elaborate ruse taking them two or three counties away in the first place before bringing them back. It's very weird.Amyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15177578450022894894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20631069.post-27940643269640483702009-08-02T00:43:06.846-04:002009-08-02T00:43:06.846-04:00I would suppose that they used the hospital becaus...I would suppose that they used the hospital because they would be able to control that situation whereas if they went to the house for the arrest they could have no idea what they were up against. Remember, whether the allegations are true or not, the officials have to act on the assumption that they are terrorists.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20631069.post-58105012086248749942009-08-01T12:23:21.392-04:002009-08-01T12:23:21.392-04:00Wa alaykum as-salaam
Glad you noticed that. I tho...Wa alaykum as-salaam<br /><br />Glad you noticed that. I thought it seemed really strange and a huge waste of time. It's not something that makes logical sense, but I wonder if we'll ever figure out why they'd pull a stupid stunt like that.Amyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15177578450022894894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20631069.post-46298618967262778982009-08-01T12:03:53.613-04:002009-08-01T12:03:53.613-04:00As-Salaamu 'alaikum,
Did you notice that the ...As-Salaamu 'alaikum,<br /><br />Did you notice that the police pulled some cruel stunt on the family, getting them to come to the hospital on the pretext that one of their family had been injured in a car crash, and telling them that they were arrested only when they got there? They lost a son to a car crash a few years ago. I fail to see why they didn't just go to the house and arrest everyone, which is what they normally do.Yusuf Smithhttp://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20631069.post-29457301072031049382009-08-01T00:50:25.960-04:002009-08-01T00:50:25.960-04:00You're right about that.
Some of the media a...You're right about that. <br /><br />Some of the media acknowledged that, reminding readers that the US supported the Afghans then, who were fighting the Soviets. <br /><br />I'm thinking that if someone receives any kind of "training" in Pakistan or Afghanistan, then it must be "militant" or "terrorist" training. <br /><br />I think they're bringing it up just because people nowadays associate Afghanistan and Pakistan with "terrorism." So just by mentioning it, they're prejudicing the people against the accused. E.g., "He went to Afghanistan? Then he <b>must</b> be with Al-Qaeda." <br /><br />Ignorance, and jumping to conclusions, and the media is only helping.Amyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15177578450022894894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20631069.post-3546702725416186112009-07-31T22:34:07.670-04:002009-07-31T22:34:07.670-04:00I noticed the media claimed Daniel Boyd received &...I noticed the media claimed Daniel Boyd received "terrorist training" in Pakistan and Afghanistan, but look at the dates he was there; from 1989 to 1992. This was when the U.S. was down with Jihad and promoted it. Guess who funded the "terrorist training" he received? Shouldn't these people be indicted also? Charlie Wilson, George Bush and postmortem Ronny Reagan. The hypocrisy is quote astonishing...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com